{"id":52966,"date":"2022-11-21T14:00:13","date_gmt":"2022-11-21T14:00:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/?p=52966"},"modified":"2022-11-21T14:04:41","modified_gmt":"2022-11-21T14:04:41","slug":"sec-proposes-new-climate-related-risk-disclosure-rule","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/21\/sec-proposes-new-climate-related-risk-disclosure-rule\/","title":{"rendered":"SEC PROPOSES NEW CLIMATE-RELATED RISK DISCLOSURE RULE"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[et_pb_section fb_built=&#8221;1&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.16&#8243; width=&#8221;87%&#8221; custom_margin=&#8221;-165px||||false|false&#8221; custom_padding=&#8221;3px|||||&#8221; locked=&#8221;off&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][et_pb_row _builder_version=&#8221;4.16&#8243; width=&#8221;95%&#8221; max_width=&#8221;1749px&#8221; custom_padding=&#8221;|||&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][et_pb_column type=&#8221;4_4&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.16&#8243; custom_padding=&#8221;|||&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221; custom_padding__hover=&#8221;|||&#8221;][et_pb_cta title=&#8221;SEC PROPOSES NEW CLIMATE-RELATED RISK DISCLOSURE RULE  &#8221; button_url=&#8221;#TOP&#8221; _builder_version=&#8221;4.19.1&#8243; header_font=&#8221;Georgia|700|||||||&#8221; header_font_size=&#8221;22px&#8221; header_line_height=&#8221;1.5em&#8221; body_font=&#8221;Noto Sans||||||||&#8221; body_font_size=&#8221;17px&#8221; body_line_height=&#8221;2em&#8221; use_background_color=&#8221;off&#8221; custom_button=&#8221;on&#8221; button_text_size=&#8221;17px&#8221; button_text_color=&#8221;#ffffff&#8221; button_bg_color=&#8221;#ff6b5a&#8221; button_border_width=&#8221;5px&#8221; button_border_color=&#8221;#ff6b5a&#8221; button_border_radius=&#8221;100px&#8221; button_font=&#8221;Noto Sans|700||on|||||&#8221; button_use_icon=&#8221;off&#8221; text_orientation=&#8221;left&#8221; background_layout=&#8221;light&#8221; max_width=&#8221;100%&#8221; module_alignment=&#8221;center&#8221; custom_margin=&#8221;|||&#8221; hover_enabled=&#8221;0&#8243; header_font_size_tablet=&#8221;&#8221; header_font_size_phone=&#8221;34px&#8221; header_font_size_last_edited=&#8221;on|phone&#8221; button_text_color_hover=&#8221;#ffffff&#8221; button_border_color_hover=&#8221;#ff9e59&#8243; button_bg_color_hover=&#8221;#ff9e59&#8243; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221; button_text_size__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_one_text_size__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_two_text_size__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_text_color__hover_enabled=&#8221;on&#8221; button_text_color__hover=&#8221;#ffffff&#8221; button_one_text_color__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_two_text_color__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_border_width__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_one_border_width__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_two_border_width__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_border_color__hover_enabled=&#8221;on&#8221; button_border_color__hover=&#8221;#ff9e59&#8243; button_one_border_color__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_two_border_color__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_border_radius__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_one_border_radius__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_two_border_radius__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_one_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_two_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_bg_color__hover_enabled=&#8221;on&#8221; button_bg_color__hover=&#8221;#ff9e59&#8243; button_one_bg_color__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; button_two_bg_color__hover_enabled=&#8221;off&#8221; sticky_enabled=&#8221;0&#8243;]<\/p>\n<div>\n<header class=\"aba-article-header\"><strong>Posted on March 23, 2022 by Karen Aldridge Crawford<\/strong><\/header>\n<header class=\"aba-article-header\"><strong><\/strong><\/header>\n<header class=\"aba-article-header\"><span><\/span><\/header>\n<p><\/p>\n<header class=\"aba-article-header\">On Monday, March 21, 2022, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced issuance of a proposed new climate-related financial risk reporting rule in a public webcast.\u00a0 The Commission\u2019s chair and some members and staffers argued the proposed risk disclosure requirements would help issuers more efficiently and effectively disclose such risks to investors who need reliable information about climate risk to make informed investing decisions.\u00a0 Comments on this proposed rule are due either 30 days following publication in the Federal Register or May 20, 2022, whichever provides the longer comment period.<\/p>\n<p>The<span>\u00a0<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sec.gov\/rules\/proposed\/2022\/33-11042.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">510-page announcement<\/a>, titled \u201cThe Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors,\u201d includes the proposed rule (which starts on page 469).\u00a0 The proposed rule sets forth three categories of emissions which would require reporting.\u00a0 Public companies would be required to report on Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions linked to direct and indirect emissions which result from the company\u2019s operations and energy purchases, respectively, while Scope 3 emissions related to those of the reporting companies\u2019 suppliers and customers who use the companies\u2019 products would also be required to be reported by some public companies. The proposed rule provides for exemptions for smaller companies from Scope 3 reporting requirements and a safe harbor from liability associated with Scope 3 reporting.<\/p>\n<p>The introduction to the proposed rule states the required disclosures would<br \/>\n<em>Provide consistent, comparable, and reliable \u2013 and therefore decision-useful- information to investors to enable them to make informed judgements about the impact of climate-related risks on current and potential investments.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>And, citing Section 7 of the Securities Act, went on to state that<br \/>\n<em>The Commission has broad authority to promulgate disclosure requirements that are \u201cnecessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The Commission determined that, after consideration of this statutory standard, disclosure of information about climate-related risks and metrics would be in the public interest and would protect investors.\u00a0 The Commission also stated that it considered whether the proposed disclosures \u201cwill promote efficiency, competition, and capital formation\u201d as required by the Securities Act.<\/p>\n<p>In the rule summary, Scope 1 emissions are described as direct GHG emissions that occur from sources owned or controlled by the company, such as emissions from company-owned or controlled machinery or vehicles, or methane emissions from petroleum operations. Scope 2 emissions are described as those emissions primarily resulting from the generation of electricity purchased and consumed by the company, such as emissions derive from the activities of another party (the power provider), which are considered indirect emissions. Scope 3 emissions are described as all other indirect emissions not accounted for in Scope 2 emissions that are a consequence of the company\u2019s activities but are generated from sources neither owned nor controlled by the company, \u00a0such as emissions associated with the production and transportation of goods supplied by third parties, employee commuting or business travel, and the use of the reporting company\u2019s products.<\/p>\n<p>The very prescriptive proposed climate-related disclosure rule\u2019s framework is modeled, at least in part, on the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosure\u2019s (TCFD) recommendations, and also draws upon the GHG Protocol. In particular, the proposed rules would require a company to disclose information about:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The oversight and governance of climate-related risks by the company\u2019s board and management;<\/li>\n<li>How any identified climate-related risks have affected or are likely to affect the company\u2019s strategy, business model, and outlook;<\/li>\n<li>The company\u2019s processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks and whether any such processes are integrated into the company\u2019s overall risk management system or processes;<\/li>\n<li>The impact of climate-related events (severe weather events and other natural conditions as well as physical risks identified by the company) and transition activities (including transition risks identified by the company) on the line items of a company\u2019s consolidated financial statements and related expenditures,<\/li>\n<li>Scopes 1 and 2 GHG emissions metrics, separately disclosed, are to be expressed:\n<ul>\n<li>Both by disaggregated constituent greenhouse gases and in the<\/li>\n<li>In absolute and carbon intensity (or GHG intensity) terms;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Scope 3 GHG emissions and intensity, if material, or if the company has set a GHG emissions reduction target or goal that includes its Scope 3 emissions; and<\/li>\n<li>The company\u2019s climate-related targets or goals, and transition plan, if any, along with information concerning any identified climate-related opportunities.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>These new disclosure requirements would be phased in for companies depending on their size and filing status.\u00a0 The proposal sets the earliest applicable compliance deadline dates at one fiscal year from the rules\u2019 effective date.\u00a0 The rule further requires a third-party attestation requiring that third party be demonstrably independent, but the Commission is requesting comment on specific aspects of 1) the level of assurance and 2) the minimum qualifications for the attestation provider that should be required.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, the rule sets forth the financial reports and filing forms which require the inclusion of the climate-related risk disclosure and provides instructions for both use of the forms and electronic filing of those forms.<\/p>\n<p>Interestingly, the Commission\u2019s very public vote and discussion was not unanimous.\u00a0 Not unexpectedly, the sole Republican on the Commission, Hester Peirce, voted against issuance of the proposed rule and filed a 17-page dissent titled \u201cWe are Not the Securities and Environment Commission \u2013 at Least Not Yet.\u201d\u00a0 Peirce argued the proposed rule would hurt investors, that the rule is based on \u201cfaulty quantitative analyses,\u201d \u00a0that the commission was \u201cdoing the bidding of an array of non-investor stakeholders,\u201d that the Commission is underestimating the costs to comply with the proposed rule, and that the existing disclosure requirements already capture material risks arising from climate change.\u00a0 She stated that the quantitative data requirements in the proposed rule are in large part, highly unreliable. The dissent is posted on the Commission website.<\/p>\n<p>Pierce\u2019s dissent challenges the Commission\u2019s stated concern that the existing disclosures of climate-related risks do not adequately protect investors and these additional requirements may be necessary or appropriate to improve the consistency, comparability, and reliability of climate-related disclosures, by requiring specific scopes of disclosures, along with the methodologies, data sources assumptions and other key parameters used to assess those risks.\u00a0 \u00a0She argues that the proposed rule removes the materiality measure from some aspects of the risk reporting requirements.<\/p>\n<p>Some commenters believe the Scope 3 issues will be the most difficult, as they require data (or estimates) related to third parties.\u00a0 There is much discussion of the reliance on third-party data in the Commission\u2019s announcement of the rule, along with discussion of the differences of opinion among prior commenters on the levels of assurance that should be required and the audit requirements (or even auditability) of climate-related risk evaluations\/assessments.\u00a0 There were 600 independent (termed \u201cunique\u201d) comment letters and 5800 form letters received by the Commission in response to its March 2021 request for public input on climate disclosure.\u00a0 There will likely be as many or more comments on this proposed rule and much future litigation resulting from its promulgation.<\/p>\n<\/header>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"article-content basecomponent\">\n<section class=\"aba-article-content\"><\/section>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>[\/et_pb_cta][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Posted on March 23, 2022 by Karen Aldridge Crawford On Monday, March 21, 2022, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced issuance of a proposed new climate-related financial risk reporting rule in a public webcast.\u00a0 The Commission\u2019s chair and some members and staffers argued the proposed risk disclosure requirements would help issuers more efficiently and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Posted on March 21, 2013 by Karen Crawford<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The EPA issued its long-awaited CISWI Rule in the Federal Register on February 7, 2013. 78 FR 9112. The final rule, entitled \u201cCommercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units;<br>Reconsideration and Final Amendments; Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid<br>Waste,\u201d contains the provisions in EPA\u2019s 2011 rule, vacated in January 2012, that EPA agreed to<br>reconsider. The 2011 final rule in turn superseded EPA\u2019s 2000 CISWI rule. The new CISWI Rule<br>amends 40 CFR part 60 subparts CCCC and DDDD and part 241. The amendments to 40 CFR part 60 subpart DDDD, along with certain incorporations by reference, were effective on the<br>promulgation date; amendments to part 60 subpart CCCC are effective August 7, 2013, and those to 40 CFR part 241 are effective April 8, 2013.<br>In response to both the court\u2019s vacatur of a Notice of Delay issued in 2011 and the numerous petitions for reconsideration and comments submitted by the regulated community and the<br>public, the final rule includes three subcategories of ERUs (energy recovery units) and two<br>subcategories for waste-burning kilns based on design-type differences, with separate carbon<br>monoxide (CO) limits for the latter. Certain limits were also revised based on comments<br>regarding the CO span methodology and on incorporation of additional data. The rule establishes<br>stack testing and continuous monitoring requirements and allows for the use of continuous<br>emissions monitoring systems (CEMS), setting levels based on a 3 hour block or 30-day rolling<br>average (depending on the parameter and subcategory of CISWI).<br>The rule addresses and preserves a source\u2019s choice to cease or start combusting solid waste at<br>any time due to market conditions or other reasons, and to switch from one set of applicable<br>emission standards to another pursuant to CAA section 112, thereby amending the original \"once<br>in always in\" approach reflected in the earlier versions of this rule. This in turn will provide an<br>incentive to the regulated community to continue operating incinerators.<br>The deadline for compliance with the CISWI Rule by existing sources depends primarily on when the state implementation plan incorporating the final rule is approved, with such approval<br>required no later than five years after the February 7, 2013 Federal Register publication date. The effective date for new source compliance is August 7, 2013 or the date of startup, whichever date is later. New sources are defined as sources that began construction on or after June 4, 2010, or commenced reconstruction or modification after August 7, 2013.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->","_et_gb_content_width":"793","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-52966","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SEC PROPOSES NEW CLIMATE-RELATED RISK DISCLOSURE RULE - Klac Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/21\/sec-proposes-new-climate-related-risk-disclosure-rule\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SEC PROPOSES NEW CLIMATE-RELATED RISK DISCLOSURE RULE - Klac Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Posted on March 23, 2022 by Karen Aldridge Crawford On Monday, March 21, 2022, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced issuance of a proposed new climate-related financial risk reporting rule in a public webcast.\u00a0 The Commission\u2019s chair and some members and staffers argued the proposed risk disclosure requirements would help issuers more efficiently and [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/21\/sec-proposes-new-climate-related-risk-disclosure-rule\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Klac Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-11-21T14:00:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-11-21T14:04:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/21\/sec-proposes-new-climate-related-risk-disclosure-rule\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/21\/sec-proposes-new-climate-related-risk-disclosure-rule\/\",\"name\":\"SEC PROPOSES NEW CLIMATE-RELATED RISK DISCLOSURE RULE - Klac Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-11-21T14:00:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-11-21T14:04:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/621decac54e9280b38dcf19052ae7ed0\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/21\/sec-proposes-new-climate-related-risk-disclosure-rule\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/21\/sec-proposes-new-climate-related-risk-disclosure-rule\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/21\/sec-proposes-new-climate-related-risk-disclosure-rule\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SEC PROPOSES NEW CLIMATE-RELATED RISK DISCLOSURE RULE\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/\",\"name\":\"Klac Law Firm\",\"description\":\"Klac Law Firm\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/621decac54e9280b38dcf19052ae7ed0\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3b4404843ed567da51bd99ddb87a595f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3b4404843ed567da51bd99ddb87a595f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SEC PROPOSES NEW CLIMATE-RELATED RISK DISCLOSURE RULE - Klac Law Firm","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/21\/sec-proposes-new-climate-related-risk-disclosure-rule\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SEC PROPOSES NEW CLIMATE-RELATED RISK DISCLOSURE RULE - Klac Law Firm","og_description":"Posted on March 23, 2022 by Karen Aldridge Crawford On Monday, March 21, 2022, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced issuance of a proposed new climate-related financial risk reporting rule in a public webcast.\u00a0 The Commission\u2019s chair and some members and staffers argued the proposed risk disclosure requirements would help issuers more efficiently and [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/21\/sec-proposes-new-climate-related-risk-disclosure-rule\/","og_site_name":"Klac Law Firm","article_published_time":"2022-11-21T14:00:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-11-21T14:04:41+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/21\/sec-proposes-new-climate-related-risk-disclosure-rule\/","url":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/21\/sec-proposes-new-climate-related-risk-disclosure-rule\/","name":"SEC PROPOSES NEW CLIMATE-RELATED RISK DISCLOSURE RULE - Klac Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-11-21T14:00:13+00:00","dateModified":"2022-11-21T14:04:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/621decac54e9280b38dcf19052ae7ed0"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/21\/sec-proposes-new-climate-related-risk-disclosure-rule\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/21\/sec-proposes-new-climate-related-risk-disclosure-rule\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/21\/sec-proposes-new-climate-related-risk-disclosure-rule\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SEC PROPOSES NEW CLIMATE-RELATED RISK DISCLOSURE RULE"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/","name":"Klac Law Firm","description":"Klac Law Firm","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/621decac54e9280b38dcf19052ae7ed0","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3b4404843ed567da51bd99ddb87a595f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3b4404843ed567da51bd99ddb87a595f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/klaclaw.com"],"url":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52966"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52966"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52966\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52972,"href":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52966\/revisions\/52972"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52966"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52966"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klaclaw.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}